Feoffee Payment Pages Home Page
Back Family History Intro   New Search
The following lists entries from page 133 of the feoffee payment ledgers.
Go to: page:
or:  year:
Date Name Type Description Amount (£ s d)  
21/12/1792 William Atwood support TE 0 - 04 - 00  
21/12/1792 Thomas Frost support TE 0 - 03 - 06  
21/12/1792 Joseph Ange ? support TE 0 - 05 - 06  
21/12/1792 Thomas Herbert support TE 0 - 03 - 00  
21/12/1792 William Mills support TE 0 - 05 - 00  
21/12/1792 Jacob Herbert support TE 0 - 04 - 06  
21/12/1792 Widow Trippett support TE 0 - 03 - 00  
21/12/1792 Thomas Nicholls support TE 0 - 06 - 00  
21/12/1792 Widow Wattoth support TE 0 - 03 - 00  
21/12/1792 Thomas Tebbett support TE 0 - 04 - 06  
21/12/1792 John Pain support TE 0 - 02 - 06  
21/12/1792 Benjamyn Mills support TE 0 - 05 - 00  
21/12/1792 William Lattimore support TE 0 - 03 - 00  
21/12/1792 support The following names are headed Bullington End Poor I will enter BE after the names 0 - 00 - 00  
21/12/1792 John Bates support BE 0 - 04 - 00  
21/12/1792 Daniell Gostelow support BE 0 - 07 - 00  
21/12/1792 William Aris support BE 0 - 05 - 00  
21/12/1792 Widow Aris support BE 0 - 04 - 00  
21/12/1792 Widow Tebbett support BE 0 - 04 - 00  
21/12/1792 John Aris support BE 0 - 04 - 00  
21/12/1792 Widow Nicholls support BE 0 - 04 - 00  
21/12/1792 Thomas Caves support BE 0 - 04 - 06  
21/12/1792 Thomas Denton support BE 0 - 05 - 00  
21/12/1792 support The following names are headed Malt Mill Lane & Green End I will enter MM after names 0 - 00 - 00  
21/12/1792 Thomas Adkins support MM 0 - 04 - 00  
21/12/1792 William Pinfold support MM 0 - 05 - 00  
21/12/1792 Thomas Surrage support MM 0 - 05 - 00  
21/12/1792 William Marriott support MM 0 - 05 - 06  
21/12/1792 Benjamyn Stoneton support MM 0 - 04 - 00  
21/12/1792 James Inwood support MM 0 - 03 - 00  
21/12/1792 William Smith support MM 0 - 04 - 00  
21/12/1792 Joseph Nicholls support MM 0 - 06 - 00  
21/12/1792 Samuell Clifton support MM 0 - 05 - 00  
21/12/1792 Jethro Inwood support MM 0 - 04 - 00  
21/12/1792 George Chuckley support MM 0 - 05 - 06  
21/12/1792 William Stontone support Badgers balney 0 - 04 - 06  
21/12/1792 William Fawson support MM 0 - 05 - 00  
21/12/1792 John Cooke support MM 0 - 04 - 06  
21/12/1792 William Soulbry support MM 0 - 05 - 00  
21/12/1792 Matthew Smith support MM 0 - 03 - 00  
21/12/1792 Widow Nicholls support MM 0 - 04 - 06  
21/12/1792 Warrick Stoneton support MM Warrick Stoneton's Wife 0 - 03 - 06  
21/12/1792 John Scott support MM 0 - 04 - 06  
21/12/1792 Elizabeth Chuckley support MM 0 - 01 - 06  
21/12/1792 support The following names are headed Pindon End & Stocking Green Poor I will enter PE after the names 0 - 00 - 00  
21/12/1792 John Frost support PE Senior 0 - 06 - 00  
21/12/1792 Thomas Clarke support PE 0 - 05 - 06  
21/12/1792 Edward Ditum support PE 0 - 06 - 06  
21/12/1792 Daniell Smith support PE 0 - 05 - 06  
21/12/1792 Widow Simmons support PE 0 - 05 - 06  
21/12/1792 Elizabeth Simmons support PE 0 - 02 - 00  
21/12/1792 Widow Bevans support PE 0 - 04 - 00  
21/12/1792 Matthew Lane support PE 0 - 06 - 00  
21/12/1792 Widow Banks support PE 0 - 05 - 00  
21/12/1792 Widow Bull support PE 0 - 03 - 06  
21/12/1792 William Smith support PE 0 - 04 - 06  
21/12/1792 Thomas Lever support PE 0 - 05 - 00  
First Page Previous Page Next Page Last Page
Notes:  
  Click on the name of a person to see all the entries for that person.
  The Feoffee was a charity which owned several properties and provide aid to the poor from the income derived from these properties.
  Feoffee payment ledgers survive for the period 1766 to 1866.  During this period, it appears that the Feoffee owned Stafford House and was running it as a work house.
  The payment are of two types:
support payments to beneficiaries, occasionally with a brief explanation of why the support was needed

payments for services or taxes, usually connected with the maintenance of feoffee properties, sometimes with an indication of the work
  Most of the support payments are made in the winter months, presumably because there was insufficient agricultural work to provide employment for everyone in these months.

Back Home Page Family History Intro   New Search